A culturally relative approach to the historical Messiah – Letting the Prophets Speak.
Do we see in G-d what the Indo-Europeans saw in Gud-an? Pagan imagery in an otherwise Hebrew teaching? ‘You shall not make an image’, said the true ‘Elohiym! You decide. By Fortress of Lugh. Reminder, the content you see is not an endorsement to the authors’ belief system, of which I know nothing. The video link here is to be used with critical analysis, the goal? to better identify facts in history, to increase our capacity to amplify the things we need to back out. To arrive at an original Biblical narrative: To let the Prophets in.
G-d: אֱלֹהִיםʼĕlôhîym, el-o-heem’; plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used(in the plural thus,especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative:—angels, × exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), × (very) great, judges, × mighty.https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h430/kjv/wlc/0-1/
Angels: מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk’ (plural malik); from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of ‘God’ [‘Elohiym], i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):—ambassador, angel,king, messenger.https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h4397/kjv/wlc/0-1/
